ylliX - Online Advertising Network
Advertisements

Less than two months ago, Switzerland became the first nation ever to be condemned by an international court for not doing enough to combat climate change, in a ruling by the European Court of Human Rights.

Advertisements

The renewables law was approved by parliament last year, and most environmental organizations back the legislation and its ambitions.

They include heavyweights Greenpeace and WWF.

Reacting to the referendum result, Greenpeace said it meant nuclear was now “obsolete” and urged Swiss energy group Axpo to “set a deadline for the swift and definitive halt of the two reactors and the Beznau nuclear plant”.

READ: Swiss region rejects plan to fast-track solar parks on Alpine mountainsides

“They are among the oldest reactors still active on the planet and pose an insoluble security risk,” it said.

Environment and Energy Minister Albert Rosti said the law was “an important milestone for strengthening the security of supply” in Switzerland, particularly in winter.

Hard-right opposition

It aims to boost wind and solar power’s current minuscule contribution to Switzerland’s energy mix and rapidly increase hydro production so the wealthy landlocked country is less dependent on imported electricity.

The law envisages installing solar panels on building roofs and facades.

Advertisements

It also eases planning permission for wind turbines and large solar installations.

Advertisements

Critics, including a few smaller environmental groups, argue the law will fast-track large-scale energy projects and see Switzerland’s pristine Alpine landscapes plastered with wind turbines and solar panels.

They also say locals will have only limited possibilities to appeal against the construction of new renewable energy installations.

Switzerland’s largest party, the hard-right Swiss People’s Party (SVP), also opposed the law, above all in the name of defending civil nuclear power, which provided 32 percent of total energy production last year.

After the vote it complained the law would provide Swiss people with “little electricity, at a high price” and result in “massive environmental destruction”.

The government acknowledged that court appeals against large energy projects “will probably be less likely to succeed than before”.

Health initiatives spurned

But it said projects would be examined on a case-by-case basis and constructing large installations in “biotopes of national importance” and migratory bird reservations will remain banned, albeit with some exceptions.

The law foresees 16 hydroelectric projects, a sector which last year represented 57 percent of domestic power generation. These involve building new dams or heightening existing ones.

Under Switzerland’s direct democracy system, citizens can trigger votes on topics by collecting 100,000 valid signatures within 18 months. Voting takes place every three months.

There were also ballots on Sunday on three health-related topics, all of which were rejected.

Voters threw out a proposal to cap health contributions at 10 percent of income and a bid to limit health costs.

They also spurned an initiative tabled by opponents of measures introduced to stem the spread of COVID-19.



Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.


Your subscription has been successful.

Although it did not specifically mention vaccines, the proposal said people who refused to give consent for certain medical procedures should not be penalized.





Source link

Advertisements

Please Login to Comment.

Verified by MonsterInsights