#image_title
With the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) use in content creation, many online publishers are curious about how Google Search handles AI-generated content. Does Google penalize it or can it perform well in search rankings?
According to Google‘s guidelines, the key factors are the quality and intent behind the content, not its method of creation. High-quality, original, and user-focused content that adheres to Google’s principles of expertise, experience, authoritativeness, and trustworthiness (E-E-A-T) can thrive in search rankings, regardless of whether it is human- or AI-generated.
Google consistently emphasizes high-quality content, regardless of its
production method. Their ranking systems reward content that demonstrates
expertise, experience, authoritativeness, and trustworthiness (E-E-A-T). This
core principle ensures users receive reliable and helpful information when
they search.
A decade ago, concerns arose over mass-produced human-generated content
flooding search results. Google responded by refining its systems to reward
high-quality content, a principle that remains unchanged with AI-generated
content. Google’s focus is on the content’s quality and helpfulness, not its
origin.
Google recognizes that not all automation or AI-generated content is spam.
Automation has been used for years to generate useful content like sports
scores, weather forecasts, and transcripts. AI can enhance creativity and help
people produce valuable content. However, using AI to manipulate search
rankings violates Google’s spam policies. The helpful content system,
introduced to ensure content is created primarily for users, evaluates content
based on its overall helpfulness, whether human or AI-generated.
Google encourages creators to focus on producing original, high-quality,
people-first content adhering to E-E-A-T principles. Creators should consider
the following:
Who: Who is responsible for the content? Is there clear authorship and
accountability?
How: How was the content created? Was it intended to provide value to
users?
Why: Why was the content created? Was it made to genuinely inform and
help users, or just to manipulate search rankings?
Is AI Content Against Google Search’s Guidelines?
No, the appropriate use of AI is not against Google’s guidelines. The key is
that AI-generated content should not be used to manipulate search rankings.
Why Doesn’t Google Search Ban AI Content?
Automation, including AI, has long been used to create useful content. AI can
generate helpful content in innovative ways, and banning it outright would be
counterproductive.
How Does Google Prevent Poor Quality AI Content?
Google has systems in place to handle poor quality content, whether human or
AI-generated. These systems evaluate content’s helpfulness and reliability,
ensuring high-quality information is prioritized.
Google’s systems aim to surface high-quality information from reliable sources
and avoid content that contradicts well-established consensus on critical
topics. This applies to both human and AI-generated content.
Google employs various systems, including SpamBrain, to detect spam patterns
and signals, ensuring that spam content, regardless of its origin, is
identified and managed.
AI-generated content does not receive any special treatment in search
rankings. If it meets the criteria of being useful, original, and
demonstrating E-E-A-T, it can rank well. If it does not, it will not perform
well in search results.
If AI helps produce content that is helpful and original, it can be a valuable
tool. However, if the goal is to game search rankings, it is not advisable.
Google suggests including accurate author bylines and disclosing the use of AI
or automation when it is reasonable to expect readers to ask, “How was this
created?”
Google does not inherently punish AI-generated content. Instead, the focus is
on the quality and intent behind the content. By adhering to E-E-A-T
principles and ensuring content is created to genuinely help users, creators
can succeed in Google Search, regardless of whether they use AI in their
content creation process.
The family of the missing Lancashire 19-year-old Jay Slater has hit out at some of…
PHILIPPINE carrier Cebu Pacific is set to acquire 152 airbus planes worth $24 billion or…
The publicly funded society that provides independent legal aid for low-income Albertans says its contract with…
Hurricane Beryl was the latest Atlantic storm to rapidly intensify, growing quickly from a tropical…
Oly Okaro will be the Akari Chargers’ import for the upcoming PVL Reinforced Conference.–Photo from…
The best way to enjoy and learn about the Philippines? Through food — a universal…
This website uses cookies.