Lords tell Sunak: Don’t send Afghan heroes to Rwanda

Afghan heroes who helped British forces should not be deported to Rwanda, Rishi Sunak has been urged, as the House of Lords tries to force a change in the government’s flagship stop the boats bill.

Four members of Lords, including two former chiefs of the defence staff, a former defence secretary and a former British ambassador to the US, want to add an exemption into the Rwanda Bill to stop those who have worked alongside the UK forces and arrive in Britain via unsafe and illegal routes being sent to the African country.

It came as Tory peer Lord Tugendhat, accused the Government of behaving like the ruling party in George Orwell’s dystopian novel 1984 as the debate in the Lords got under way. Members have already inflicted one defeat on the government by voting to ensure that the legislation is fully compliant with domestic and international law, and the Afghan exemption amendment will be debated and voted on on Wednesday.

The call to help those who supported UK forces comes after a string of reports by The Independent which have highlighted the plight of Afghan heroes who have been threatened with deportation to Rwanda after feeling forced to take dangerous routes to the UK.

One air force lieutenant who risked his life on combat missions in support of coalition forces was threatened with removal to Rwanda after he arrived in Britain on a small boat because he could not wait for help from the government’s Afghan resettlement schemes. That threat has now been removed and he has been granted asylum in Britain after the government was forced into a U-turn by this publication.

Leading lawyer Lord Carlile, the former independent reviewer of terrorism legislation who sits in the Lords, said it was “just, fair and required” to stop such people being deported, adding that there will be a lot of support within the upper chamber to back the amendment. General Sir Richard Dannatt, the former head of the army, also said he backed the move.

The amendment, due to be voted on on Wednesday, is being brought forward by former Labour defence secretary Lord Browne of Ladyton, who highlighted his concerns with the proposed law by citing four examples of cases uncovered by The Independent.

They include former members of the Afghan special forces units, known as The Triples, who were paid, trained and fought alongside the UK special forces. One former senior British diplomat said it “beggared belief” that these soldiers, who were forced to flee the Taliban, could face being deported to the east Africa country after all they had been through.

Under the terms of the Illegal Migration Act, the government is required to remove illegal migrants who entered the country after 20 July 2023, when the act received royal assent. The Act also bans ministers from granting asylum to anyone who entered the UK illegally on or after 7 March 2023, when it had its first reading.

The new clause, which is also being proposed by three crossbench peers, Lord Houghton of Richmond, Lord Stirrup, and Lord Kerr of Kinlochard, would mean that people of any nationality who supported the armed forces overseas in an “exposed or meaningful manner” or who were “employed by or indirectly contracted to provide services to the UK government in an exposed or meaningful manner” would be ineligible for Rwanda deportation. It would also exempt their family members from deportation.

Lord Carlile told The Independent he would support the amendment, adding that they would be at risk of being deported back to Afghanistan from Rwanda – further putting their lives in danger.

“If it is put to the vote, there will be a lot of support for not sending people who worked with Britain in Afghanistan to Rwanda – provided peers are satisfied it is drawn in a way which would not allow for people to use the system illegitimately,” he said.

“Obviously we want to help genuine Afghans who would be in real trouble if, via Rwanda, they were returned to Afghanistan,” he added.

He added: “We have to understand that the House of Lords cannot simply wreck government legislation, we are not trying to do that.

“But if there is something that is just and fair and required, then we will say to the government, ‘this is not acceptable’.”

General Lord Dannatt, former chief of the general staff, also said he supported the amendment, though he wasn’t present in the Lords on Monday.

Tim Willasey-Wilsey, a former diplomat who worked closely with Triples’ unit 333 and is now a visiting professor at King’s College London, welcomed Lord Browne’s amendment and said that the idea that men and women who had been forced to flee to escape murder in Afghanistan because of their service in the Triples could be sent to Rwanda “beggared belief”.

He added: “It is imperative that the House of Commons should accept Lord Browne’s amendment.”

Julian Lewis, the Conservative MP and former chair of the Commons defence select committee, said: “I’m very sympathetic to rescuing Afghans at risk for having helped the UK NATO/ISAF forces to fight the Taliban.

“Provided that their specific Service background can be verified by our MoD and/or individual veterans, it ought to be possible for them to apply to come here from the first safe country they reach, and it should not be necessary for them to make a risky and illegal Channel crossing.”

He said he would look closely at the proposal before backing it.

Examples of those who have been threatened with deportation are an Afghan colonel who worked alongside British troops in joint operations in Helmand province who arrived in the UK by small boat in September 2022.

The Independent also revealed how an Afghan intelligence analyst who worked in the Office of the National Security Council, a department initially funded by the UK for intelligence sharing, fled to the UK via irregular means because he felt he could not afford to wait for help through official routes.

Another case, highlighted by The Independent and investigative newsroom Lighthouse Reports, detailed how an Afghan special forces sniper who served in the Triples units had come to the UK on a small boat. This soldier has been languishing in a hotel room for 17 months without his asylum case being processed.

The Ministry of Defence is currently conducting a review into the cases of Afghan special forces soldiers who were rejected for relocation to the UK, with defence minister James Heappey admitting some of the decisions were “inconsistent” and “not robust”.

Other amendments being looked at include ones which challenge the government’s assessment that Rwanda is a safe country. One amendment argues that parliament can’t judge Rwanda to be safe until extra measures, required by the UK Supreme Court, such as a monitory committee over asylum decisions, have been fully implemented.

The Supreme Court ruled last year that the government’s plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. Despite this Rishi Sunak has brought in new legislation to declare the African country is safe and urged the House of Lords to not “frustrate the will of the people” by blocking his plans.

He has called on peers to pass the bill “as quickly as possible”, with the aim of getting flights airbourne by Spring.