Validity of marriage regardless of the purpose

Validity of marriage regardless of the purpose
Spread the love

Dear Pao,

Advertisements

A few years ago, I got married in the Philippines to an American citizen whom I met on a dating app to facilitate my work abroad. But upon coming to the US, I met another person who really made me fall in love. Can I contest my previous marriage as invalid because I was not in love with my husband when we got married?

Mica

Dear Mica,

Advertisements
Advertisements

Please be informed of the Supreme Court’s ruling in the case of Republic v Albios (GR 198780, Oct. 16, 2013, Ponente: Associate Justice Jose Mendoza) where it was held that:

Advertisements

Get the latest news


delivered to your inbox

Sign up for The Manila Times newsletters

Advertisements
By signing up with an email address, I acknowledge that I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

“Motives for entering into a marriage are varied and complex. The State does not and cannot dictate on the kind of life that a couple chooses to lead. Any attempt to regulate their lifestyle would go into the realm of their right to privacy and would raise serious constitutional questions. The right to marital privacy allows married couples to structure their marriages in almost any way they see fit, to live together or live apart, to have children or no children, to love one another or not, and so on. Thus, marriages entered into for other purposes, limited or otherwise, such as convenience, companionship, money, status and title, provided that they comply with all the legal requisites, are equally valid. Love, though the ideal consideration in a marriage contract, is not the only valid cause for marriage. Other considerations, not precluded by law, may validly support a marriage.

Advertisements

“Although the Court views with disdain the respondent’s attempt to utilize marriage for dishonest purposes, it cannot declare the marriage void. Hence, though the respondent’s marriage may be considered a sham or fraudulent for the purposes of immigration, “it is not void ab initio and continues to be valid and subsisting.” (Emphasis supplied)

As provided in the aforementioned jurisprudence, the legal requisites mentioned in the Family Code remain to be the only requirement to support a valid marriage. Other considerations such as convenience, companionship, money, status and title are immaterial in determining the validity of marriage.

Hence, regardless of the presence or absence of love, a marriage entered into would remain valid provided that the legal requisites were complied with. Even if your sole purpose in entering a marriage is to facilitate your work abroad, such consideration would not affect the fact that you and your husband personally declared in front of the solemnizing officer your intention to be each other’s husband and wife.

We hope that we were able to answer your queries. This advice is based solely on the facts you have narrated and our application of the same. Our opinion may vary when other facts are changed or elaborated on.


Editor’s note: Dear PAO is a daily column of the Public Attorney’s Office. Questions for Chief Acosta may be sent to [emailΒ protected].



Source link

Advertisements

Please Login to Comment.

Verified by MonsterInsights